Non-Oil GDP Share: 76% ▲ -7.7pp vs 2020 | Saudi Unemployment: 3.5% ▲ -0.5pp vs 2023 | PIF AUM: $941.3B ▲ +$345B vs 2022 | Inbound FDI: $21.3B ▼ -6.4% vs 2023 | Female Participation: 33% ▲ -1.1pp vs 2023 | Credit Rating: Aa3/A+ ▲ Moody's / Fitch | GDP Growth: 2.0% ▲ +1.5pp vs 2023 | Umrah Pilgrims: 16.92M ▲ vs 11.3M target | Non-Oil GDP Share: 76% ▲ -7.7pp vs 2020 | Saudi Unemployment: 3.5% ▲ -0.5pp vs 2023 | PIF AUM: $941.3B ▲ +$345B vs 2022 | Inbound FDI: $21.3B ▼ -6.4% vs 2023 | Female Participation: 33% ▲ -1.1pp vs 2023 | Credit Rating: Aa3/A+ ▲ Moody's / Fitch | GDP Growth: 2.0% ▲ +1.5pp vs 2023 | Umrah Pilgrims: 16.92M ▲ vs 11.3M target |

Defence Sector Across the GCC: Military Industry Benchmark

Benchmarking defence industries across GCC states comparing military spending, localisation, and manufacturing.

Defence Sector Across the GCC: Military Industry Benchmark — Benchmark | Saudi Vision 2030
Advertisement

Overview

Defence spending across the GCC exceeds one hundred billion dollars annually, making the Gulf one of the world’s most significant defence procurement markets. Historically, virtually all military equipment was imported from Western and, increasingly, Asian suppliers. The current strategic shift toward defence localisation represents a major industrial policy initiative across the GCC, driven by national security imperatives, economic diversification objectives, and the recognition that defence manufacturing creates high-technology employment and builds advanced engineering capabilities transferable to civilian industries.

Saudi Arabia’s General Authority for Military Industries, established in 2017, leads the most ambitious defence localisation programme in the GCC, targeting fifty percent of military spending to be directed to domestic producers by 2030. The UAE’s EDGE Group, formed through the consolidation of multiple defence entities in 2019, represents the most advanced defence conglomerate in the Arab world. The competition between Saudi Arabia and the UAE for defence industrial leadership mirrors their broader economic rivalry and reflects the strategic importance both nations attach to military self-sufficiency.

Comparison Matrix

IndicatorSaudi ArabiaUAEQatarOmanBahrainKuwait
Defence Budget (USD bn, 2025)~$55~$24~$12~$8~$1.5~$8
Defence Spending (% GDP)~5.0%~4.5%~5.2%~8.7%~3.4%~4.8%
Localisation Target50% by 203050%+ by 2031None statedNone statedNoneNone
Defence ConglomerateSAMIEDGE GroupBarzan HoldingsN/AN/AN/A
Defence Exports (USD bn)Emerging~$6+NoneNoneNoneNone
Defence Companies100+ licensed70+ (EDGE entities)10+LimitedNoneNone
Offset ProgrammesGAMI managedTawazunMandatoryNoneNoneNone
Key CapabilitiesMunitions, MRO, vehiclesAutonomous, cyber, missilesLimitedLimitedNoneNone

Analysis

Saudi Arabia’s defence budget is the largest in the GCC and among the largest globally, providing a massive domestic procurement market that anchors the localisation strategy. GAMI has licensed over one hundred defence companies, and the Saudi Arabian Military Industries conglomerate is developing capabilities across five key domains: air systems, land systems, weapons and missiles, defence electronics, and military vehicle manufacturing. The Kingdom’s approach combines domestic capacity building with mandatory offset requirements on foreign contracts that require technology transfer and local production partnerships.

The UAE’s EDGE Group has emerged as the Arab world’s most capable defence manufacturer, with particular strengths in autonomous systems, cyber security, precision-guided munitions, and unmanned aerial vehicles. EDGE’s annual revenue exceeds six billion dollars, and the group has demonstrated genuine export competitiveness, selling defence products to customers across the Middle East, Asia, and Africa. The UAE’s defence industry development benefits from decades of gradual capability building and the Tawazun offset programme that has systematically embedded defence technology and manufacturing expertise.

Qatar and Oman are significant defence spenders relative to their GDP but have limited domestic defence industrial capacity. Qatar’s Barzan Holdings manages the Emirate’s defence industrial development, but production capability remains nascent. Oman’s defence spending of approximately 8.7 percent of GDP is the highest ratio in the GCC, reflecting the Sultanate’s strategic position and security concerns, but virtually all equipment is imported. Bahrain and Kuwait have no significant defence manufacturing capacity.

The defence technology domain, particularly in autonomous systems, cyber warfare, and AI-enabled defence applications, represents the frontier of GCC military industrial competition. Both Saudi Arabia and the UAE are investing heavily in these capabilities, recognising that next-generation defence technology will be defined by software and data as much as by traditional hardware manufacturing.

Saudi Arabia’s Position

Saudi Arabia’s defence sector represents the largest industrial localisation opportunity in the GCC, with a fifty-five billion dollar annual procurement budget providing demand that can sustain a substantial domestic industry. The Kingdom’s challenge is to build genuine manufacturing capability and technological depth rather than merely assembling imported components under local branding. Progress has been made in munitions, military vehicles, and maintenance, repair, and overhaul services, but achieving the fifty percent localisation target by 2030 requires significant acceleration in advanced manufacturing and defence electronics.

Outlook

GCC defence industries will be shaped by the evolving regional security environment, the global shift toward autonomous and AI-enabled military systems, and the strategic imperative for reduced dependence on foreign suppliers. Saudi Arabia and the UAE will remain the primary competitors for defence industrial leadership, with their combined spending creating a market large enough to sustain globally competitive defence manufacturers. The potential for GCC defence cooperation through joint procurement and production represents an opportunity for scale efficiencies, though national sovereignty concerns will limit the depth of integration.

Advertisement